Grand Prix Racing Online Forum > Off topic forum > 48÷2(9+3)=??? 2 or 288 Voeg dit onderwerp toe aan je negeerlijst Voeg dit onderwerp toe aan je volglijst
Pagina « 1 2 3 ... 10 [1112 ... 44 45 46 » Ga naar pagina:
Forum onderwerp poll
And the answer is...
Sign in om te kunnen stemmen of de resultaten te kunnen zien
Auteur Onderwerp: 48÷2(9+3)=??? 2 or 288 1376 antwoorden
Andi Bisha
(Groep Rookie - 137)


Berichten: 113
  Land:
Albanië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #301 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:39:14 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 16:44:21 door Andi Bisha) Quote 
Quote ( Theo Poufinas @ April 15th 2011,16:27:41 )

when we notate ÷ it means
__48__
2(9+3)
48 x (9+3) <-- When we notate ÷ or / it means
2

÷ is the same thing with / , Omg it is division.
Serpil Tunc
(Groep Amateur - 3)



Berichten: 6
  Land:
Turkije 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (1)
Oud bericht #302 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:40:56 Quote 
2 of course
Kevin Parkinson
(Groep Master - 2)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 14356
  Land:
Schotland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #303 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:40:57 Quote 
Quote ( Szymon Kimak @ April 15th 2011,16:38:28 )

People please read all posts!


It is getting silly now as people are just repeating arguments that have already been made.
Theo Poufinas
(Groep Pro - 8)



Berichten: 3969
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #304 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:41:48 Quote 
Quote ( Szymon Kimak @ April 15th 2011,16:38:28 )

@Theo Poufinas OMG!
Did You ever see Excel and Calculator? People please read all posts! You are so stupid!

I'm leaving this tread.


dude, don't make us stupid
you should read this thread, my discussions from last night!

i also thought the correct answer is 288
but if ÷ means what i said, the answer for this poll is 2!
start reading before telling me to read, and have some respect!
Kevin Parkinson
(Groep Master - 2)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 14356
  Land:
Schotland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #305 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:43:37 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 16:43:57 door Kevin Parkinson) Quote 
Quote ( Theo Poufinas @ April 15th 2011,16:41:48 )

but if ÷ means what i said, the answer for this poll is 2!
start reading before telling me to read, and have some respect!


Your argument is nonsense. Division is division no matter what sign you use for it.

The answer is 2, but for the reasons I and others have already given.

:)
Theo Poufinas
(Groep Pro - 8)



Berichten: 3969
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #306 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:44:49 Quote 
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,16:43:37 )

Your argument is nonsense.


if my argument is nonsense, then the result is 288
don't make me repeat why...
Kevin Parkinson
(Groep Master - 2)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 14356
  Land:
Schotland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #307 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:47:07 Quote 
Quote ( Theo Poufinas @ April 15th 2011,16:44:49 )

if my argument is nonsense, then the result is 288
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,16:43:37 )

The answer is 2, but for the reasons I and others have already given.
Quote ( Szymon Kimak @ April 15th 2011,16:38:28 )

@Theo Poufinas OMG!
Quote ( Szymon Kimak @ April 15th 2011,16:38:28 )

People please read all posts! You are so stupid!
;)
Marcelo Michelini
(Groep Amateur - 33)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 10141
  Land:
Uruguay 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #308 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:53:24 Quote 
Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ April 15th 2011,09:17:09 )

Doesn't really matter do you use "÷" or "/", if you wanna present fractions you still should use the brackets to avoid inaccuracies

it does matter and is the thing that changes everything!
notations in one line need to distinguish this things for faster typing
but don't know how universal this rules are, but I know they exist and are applied in many ways!

Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ April 15th 2011,11:35:02 )

in a single line presentation the proper usage of brackets is necessary

or the differentiation notation between rational numbers and divisions!

Quote ( Brian Branch @ April 15th 2011,13:36:18 )

Simple fact. Both sides are inventing additional material into the equation to get their desired answer. One group are inventing the *, and the other side the extra ().

I am not inventing anything!

Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,16:43:37 )

Your argument is nonsense. Division is division no matter what sign you use for it.

yes, division is division, but if you write math notations in a single line, you can differentiate rational numbers from division, because otherwise you will have to add brackets all over the place
Kevin Parkinson
(Groep Master - 2)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 14356
  Land:
Schotland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #309 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:57:02 Quote 
Quote ( Marcelo Michelini @ April 15th 2011,16:53:24 )

but if you write math notations in a single line, you can differentiate rational numbers from division, because otherwise you will have to add brackets all over the place


You're right Marcelo, but the point I had issue with was...
Quote ( Theo Poufinas @ April 15th 2011,16:27:41 )

48÷2(9+3)=2
48/2(9+3)=288


This is just a different sign for division and makes no difference to the answer.

You do allude to what I have said all along though...
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,11:45:08 )

Simple fact is this would never be written in the form it is so as to avoid any confusion.
Theo Poufinas
(Groep Pro - 8)



Berichten: 3969
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #310 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 16:57:36 Quote 
only proper reason to make 48÷2(9+3)=2 is that ÷ isn't the same with /
which i think it is the same, but Marcelo proved by a photo that ÷ is different of / ...
other reason is not proper, because you aren't allowed to do multiplication before dividing in our expression because 48:2 is before 2(9+3), ....don't know how to explain better in english
Kevin Parkinson
(Groep Master - 2)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 14356
  Land:
Schotland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #311 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:00:44 Quote 
This thread has amused me.

But enough is enough.

Quote ( Szymon Kimak @ April 15th 2011,16:38:28 )

I'm leaving this tread.


P.S. Answer is 2! :p
Theo Poufinas
(Groep Pro - 8)



Berichten: 3969
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #312 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:03:58 Quote 
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,17:00:44 )

But enough is enough.


it's enough when you remain out of arguments no?

who care's actually...lie someone said, you won't be givin' this question at a test or somethin' :)
Marcelo Michelini
(Groep Amateur - 33)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 10141
  Land:
Uruguay 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #313 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:04:23 Quote 
Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,16:57:02 )

You do allude to what I have said all along though...
that is probablly correct
but someone actually wrote this to confuse people, so here we are :p

Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 15th 2011,16:57:02 )

This is just a different sign for division and makes no difference to the answer.

to me it does changes everything
if it is /, then 48/2 is a rational number and so the unnecessary brackets would be like this
(48/2)(9+3)
if it is ÷, then the brackets would be like
48÷(2(9+3))
Zoli Ruttkay
(Groep Rookie - 141)


Berichten: 276
  Land:
Hongarije 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (4)
Oud bericht #314 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:29:46 Quote 
288
Mert Büyükakar
(Groep Pro - 11)



Berichten: 3560
  Land:
Turkije 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (4)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #315 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:38:34 Quote 
Im pretty sure that answer is 2
Cristian Iordache
(Groep Amateur - 10)



Berichten: 608
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #316 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:45:11 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 17:56:34 door Cristian Iordache) Quote 
Quote ( Marcelo Michelini @ April 14th 2011,23:41:13 )



New post #134 posted yesterday at 23:41:13 Quote


if the ÷ was a /, I would have said 288
but as it is not, I still say 2


Marcelo, can you please try " 48 ÷ 2 X ( 9 + 3 ) = " on your casio scientific calculator and tell me what you get!

try this one too: http://web2.0calc.com/
Márcio Portuga
(Groep Pro - 9)



Berichten: 1582
  Land:
Brazilië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #317 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 17:59:41 Quote 
Google says...

(48 ÷ 2) * (9 + 3) = 288
Andrew Watson
(Groep Master - 2)



Berichten: 2946
  Land:
Engeland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #318 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:06:15 Quote 
Quote ( Cristian Iordache @ April 15th 2011,17:45:11 )

Marcelo, can you please try " 48 ÷ 2 X ( 9 + 3 ) = " on your casio scientific calculator and tell me what you get!

My Casio scientific calculator gives;
Quote ( Andrew Watson @ April 15th 2011,11:45:02 )

48/2(9+3) = 2

and

48/2*(9+3) = 288
Rafal Celejewski
(Groep Elite)



Berichten: 5394
  Land:
Polen 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #319 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:07:35 Quote 
Quote ( Andrew Watson @ April 15th 2011,18:06:15 )

My Casio scientific calculator gives;


lol, if there is nothing between 2 and brackets it is always * :D
Jonathan Seifort
(Groep Rookie - 125)


Berichten: 694
  Land:
Verenigde Staten 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #320 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:08:19 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 18:10:17 door Jonathan Seifort) Quote 
Quote ( Marcelo Michelini @ April 15th 2011,17:04:23 )

to me it does changes everything
if it is /, then 48/2 is a rational number and so the unnecessary brackets would be like this
(48/2)(9+3)
if it is ÷, then the brackets would be like
48÷(2(9+3))


Again, why do you add an extra set of brackets which don't exist? Last time I checked the question was 48÷2(9+3)

48 ÷ 2 (12)
Divisions comes first, as we go from left to right:
= 24 (12)
= 288

I can't believe some ignorant people are adding brackets, or multiplying first to get the answer they want. It's called ignorance, which is tragic.

1) It's a basic rule in math to go from left to right when both division and multiplication is involved in an equation.

2) A fraction is another way to write a division, I've shown evidence on a link at AboutMath.com

3) We have no brackets around the 2, stop adding!

4) Having a number infront of another number in brackets in the exact same as multiplying, there's no difference unlike some people like to create.

If you think the answer is 2, or any other than 288, you were not educated in a proper school.
Andrew Watson
(Groep Master - 2)



Berichten: 2946
  Land:
Engeland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #321 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:09:46 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 18:10:00 door Andrew Watson) Quote 
I think my calculator is making a distinction whereby;
2*(9+3) is two functions
but;
2(9+3) is one function. It's all part of the brackets, therefore this gets calculated first.

No idea if this is the correct way of doing it though :/
Marcelo Michelini
(Groep Amateur - 33)



GPRO Medewerker
Berichten: 10141
  Land:
Uruguay 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #322 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:10:25 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 18:11:17 door Marcelo Michelini) Quote 
Quote ( Cristian Iordache @ April 15th 2011,17:45:11 )

Marcelo, can you please try " 48 ÷ 2 X ( 9 + 3 ) = " on your casio scientific calculator and tell me what you get!

it gives 288 written that way

adding the multiplication, you are taking away the 2 from the brackets, and instead dividing terms
it's a different notation! :)

see


again, it is a notation issue not a math problem, if we add symbols, that changes everything :)

Quote ( Jonathan Seifort @ April 15th 2011,18:08:19 )

Again, why do you add an extra set of brackets which don't exist? Last time I checked the question was 48÷2(9+3)

they still don't exist to resolve the problem, I add them to show you how it is interpreted with this notations...
Marvin Mackenberg
(Groep Amateur - 35)


Berichten: 355
  Land:
Duitsland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #323 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:11:40 Quote 
Quote ( Jonathan Seifort @ April 15th 2011,18:07:35 )

I can't believe some ignorant people are adding brackets, or multiplying first to get the answer they want. It's called ignorance, which is sad.


These brackets aren´t added, they are left out, because mathematicians are too lazy to write these brackets
Radomir Mihai
(Groep Rookie - 165)


Berichten: 369
  Land:
Roemenië 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (4)
Oud bericht #324 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:12:31 Quote 
it`s 288.
Jonathan Seifort
(Groep Rookie - 125)


Berichten: 694
  Land:
Verenigde Staten 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (1)
Oud bericht #325 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:12:58 Quote 
Quote ( Marvin Mackenberg @ April 15th 2011,18:11:40 )

These brackets aren´t added, they are left out, because mathematicians are too lazy to write these brackets


Yeah whateva :D

Anyway, the question is 48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 228
Andrew Watson
(Groep Master - 2)



Berichten: 2946
  Land:
Engeland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #326 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:15:40 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 18:20:41 door Andrew Watson) Quote 
From the internet;
The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).

So this can be rewritten as:
48 / (2*9 + 2*3)

Which leaves us with

48 / 24 = 2

Answer = 2.

Lastly for those using Google or any other online calculator. These do not understand many theorems or properties so you must explicitly explain what you mean. There is a difference between 48 / 2 * (9+3) and 48 / 2(9+3). The first notation reads 48 / 2 * 1(9+3) while the second reads 48 / (2*9+2*3). Be very careful with your signs.


It's got me convinced - especially the last bit in bold

Edit, and how about this;
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm
This next example displays an issue that almost never arises but, when it does, there seems to be no end to the arguing.

* Simplify 16 ÷ 2[8 – 3(4 – 2)] + 1.

16 ÷ 2[8 – 3(4 – 2)] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[8 – 3(2)] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[8 – 6] + 1
= 16 ÷ 2[2] + 1 (**)
= 16 ÷ 4 + 1
= 4 + 1
= 5

The confusing part in the above calculation is how "16 divided by 2[2] + 1" (in the line marked with the double-star) becomes "16 divided by 4 + 1", instead of "8 times by 2 + 1". That's because, even though multiplication and division are at the same level (so the left-to-right rule should apply), parentheses outrank division, so the first 2 goes with the [2], rather than with the "16 divided by". That is, multiplication that is indicated by placement against parentheses (or brackets, etc) is "stronger" than "regular" multiplication.
Rihards Zbitkovskis
(Groep Pro - 8)



Berichten: 382
  Land:
Letland 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #327 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:20:05 Quote 
I can bet all the money I have that the answer is 288.

So 48÷2(9+3)=???

- do what's inside of the brackets

48 ÷ 2 * 12 = ???

- ÷ and * have equal priority, so we perform ÷ as it is the leftmost

24 * 12 = 288

Saying that ÷ and / are different operations is utter bs.
saying that a*b is not the same as ab is even more wrong.

They are the same thing. Do not let yourself be fouled by anyone who says the opposite. Call him incompetent and go away feeling superior.

Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 14th 2011,23:56:35 )

Quote ( Kevin Parkinson @ April 14th 2011,22:57:42 )

Technically 2(9+3) should be calculated before 48 / 2 so the answer is 2.

If the question was 48 / 2 x (9+3) then the answer would be 288 but as the multiplication sign is omitted the 2(9+3) would be given priority, as if it was in parenthesis itself.


Quote ( Jonathan Seifort @ April 14th 2011,23:00:18 )

Makes no difference, a number before a bracket means the exact same as a multiplication sign.


Wrong!

Quote ( Theo Poufinas @ April 14th 2011,23:03:34 )

2(9+3) = 2*(9+3) -> same thing


Also wrong!

And the reason why I am correct is...
Quote ( Slawek Waszkiewicz @ April 14th 2011,23:35:36 )


Im sorry to ruin the fun for you, but the correct answer is here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110408055505AA......

Copy/Paste

"Distributive property of multiplication over addition. Early Algebra problem.

The distributive property of multiplication CLEARLY states that the 2(9+3) is an entire statement and CANNOT be broken up. 2(9+3) follows the distributive property which can be rewritten as (2*9+2*3). Let me repeat the 2 outside of the parenthesis follows the distributive property of multiplication and must be factored and simplified before performing any other operations on it. You do NOT compute this expression from left to right until you use Algebra to simplify the statement 2(9+3).

So this can be rewritten as:
48 / (2*9 + 2*3)

Which leaves us with

48 / 24 = 2

Answer = 2.

Lastly for those using Google or any other online calculator. These do not understand many theorems or properties so you must explicitly explain what you mean. There is a difference between 48 / 2 * (9+3) and 48 / 2(9+3). The first notation reads 48 / 2 * 1(9+3) while the second reads 48 / (2*9+2*3). Be very careful with your signs."


Well done Slawek!

I knew I was right and nice to see someone bothered to show why :)


As for distributative property, you must take the the whole 48 ÷ 2 inside brackets, you can not leave 48 out and take just two.


Otherwise:

10 * 10 = 100

20/2 (2 + 8) = 100

20 / (2*2 + 2*8) = 100

20 / (4 + 16) = 100

20 / 20 = 100

1 = 100


What now, wise guys? :)
Chinmay Dhopate
(Groep Rookie - 115)


Berichten: 7750
  Land:
India 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #328 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:23:43 (laatst aangepast Apr 15 2011, 18:28:04 door Chinmay Dhopate) Quote 
Quote ( Andrew Watson @ April 15th 2011,10:56:28 )

Why is it that if I put the equation (exactly as it was given) into my scientific calculator it gives the answer as 2? This agrees to my original method, but not to BEDMAS.


Your calculator has "Natural display"?

If it does, turn it off and then try again and see the answer...
Shoaib Mohamed
(Groep Rookie - 168)



Berichten: 9817
  Land:
India 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (0)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #329 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:26:47 Quote 
Quote ( Jonathan Seifort @ April 15th 2011,18:12:58 )

Anyway, the question is 48 ÷ 2 (9+3) = 228


Lolcopter we now have a totally different answer :S


How is this discussion still going on!?
Jonathan Seifort
(Groep Rookie - 125)


Berichten: 694
  Land:
Verenigde Staten 
Gecertificeerd: 
Vind dit een toffe post (1)   Houd niet van deze post (0)
Oud bericht #330 geplaatst Apr 15 2011, 18:29:01 Quote 
Quote ( Andrew Watson @ April 15th 2011,18:15:40 )

It's got me convinced - especially the last bit in bold


But what about the B.E.D.M.A.S ?

You will find that the question is worded ambiguously like this on purpose. One, it's ambiguous because it's written on the computer, and two it's ambiguous because once you get past a certain grade you get taught implicit multiplication.

Basically, what implicit multiplication is multiplication by juxtaposition, or placing a number right next to each other. Most commonly used for variables, eg x * 12 becomes 12x.

However, you will find that implicit multiplication takes the same precedence as regular multiplication and division do. You still do it from left to right. For example,

Likewise for this example.

48 / 2(9+3)
can be rewritten as
48 / 2 * (9+3)

because that's all implicit multiplication is. 12x = 12 * x, and likewise 2(9+3) = 2 * (9+3).

Also, BEDMAS, BODMAS, or PEMDAS, whatever you were taught. You are always taught to solve left to right, and that division and multiplication have the same precedence, and so do addition and subtraction.

And so, the equation is solved as follows:
48/2(9+3)
48/2(12)
24(12)
288

Alternatively, you can rewrite /2 as * 1/2.

48*1/2(9+3)
48*1/2(12)
24(12)
288
Pagina « 1 2 3 ... 10 [1112 ... 44 45 46 » Ga naar pagina:
Grand Prix Racing Online Forum > Off topic forum > 48÷2(9+3)=??? 2 or 288 Voeg dit onderwerp toe aan je negeerlijst Voeg dit onderwerp toe aan je volglijst

Dit onderwerp werd gesloten door de moderators!