| Forfatter |
Emne: Testing |
22 svar
|
|
|
|
#1 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 01:10:33
|
Citat
|
|
On the testing page it says I have done 100/100 laps while in reality I have finished only 87/100. On teh standings page it shows 87 but still.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 01:59:16
|
Citat
|
|
Quote ( Georgi Cholakov @ March 16th 2006,01:10:33 )
On the testing page it says I have done 100/100 laps while in reality I have finished only 87/100. On teh standings page it shows 87 but still.
You should double your glasses, loverboy!
Dont you see that some of the stints you did were not completed at 100%. It's because tyres didnt last the whole distance or maybe your fuel was less than needed :)))
That's one of the catches on testing session :)) You were supposed to find it out by yourself but it looks like you are not capable to do it, poor you ;)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:45:14
|
Citat
|
Kiril, go out, clean your glasses, come back and read again what I have said:) I mention that I finished 87 out of 100. I do not claim I finished 100 laps:)
So, I found it out myself. Have no worries:) After all, I edited this message about 2 minutes after I posted exactly because I figured this one out when I looked at it a second time.
I will repeat this one for you:) Maybe the second time you will understand the words coming out of my keyboard:)))) (Actually, I will have to repeat once again- you are a desperate case:)))
On top it says: laps done: 100/100 and it should be 87 out of 100 since I haven't done the 13 laps that the top line thinks I did. Exactly because of the reason you talk about
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:49:36
|
Citat
|
|
And one more thing on the testing page again. there should be a link to the track information page somewhere because otherwise it is awkward:) either make the name a link or make it somewhat consistent with the p & q 1 page (separate link on top)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:51:10
|
Citat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:52:22
|
Citat
|
|
that's why i started with go out:)))) cant u follow instructions damn it:))))
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:53:35
|
Citat
|
|
Quote ( Georgi Cholakov @ March 16th 2006,03:52:22 )
that's why i started with go out:)))) cant u follow instructions damn it:))))
Still the same pain in the ass :)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 03:55:22
|
Citat
|
|
i start to think you have something on your chair:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 Skrevet Mar 16 2006, 08:53:36
|
Citat
|
|
Quote ( Georgi Cholakov @ March 16th 2006,03:45:14 )
And one more thing on the testing page again. there should be a link to the track information page somewhere because otherwise it is awkward:) either make the name a link or make it somewhat consistent with the p & q 1 page (separate link on top)
I was thinking the same, a link to the circuit details woudl be nice..
As for your laps problem, the top one (100/100) is the counter for the number of laps you can do...in this case you consumed 100 of the maximum 100 .
The 87 refers to the laps actualy driven.
Maybe we shoudl change the text from "laps done" to "laps used"
|
|
|
|
|
then it should be something like 87/100/100 i think
|
|
|
|
LOL, I am sure ppl will think those will be risk settings then...
Let's put on the top of the table:
Testing stints data (laps available: 0/100, stints available: 4/10)
and in the table under laps done, it can remain unchanged
and if there is any room; laps wasted: ...
|
|
|
|
so laps done 87/100
laps remaining 0/100
stints done 10/10
is that good??:))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Georgi Cholakov @ March 18th 2006,02:07:41 )
so laps done 87/100
laps remaining 0/100
stints done 10/10
is that good??:))
I think laps remaining (or available) is enough, laps doen is not needed.
|
|
|
|
|
hans, then remove laps done from the testing standings?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Georgi Cholakov @ March 19th 2006,20:37:18 )
hans, then remove laps done from the testing standings?
why? because that is info for other managers, no? it woudl be nice to knwo how much damage othe rmanagers take for testing, or how much laps they doen and when to expect a R&D boost or dropoff?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Hans Barf @ March 19th 2006,20:51:24 )
why? because that is info for other managers, no? it woudl be nice to knwo how much damage othe rmanagers take for testing, or how much laps they doen and when to expect a R&D boost or dropoff?
Agree - it's quite important to see what rivals are doing in this area - and in RL, team tests & results are generally well publicised....
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO we should't have both paying 1M for testing session and have car wear during it. It can be either wear of car parts, so it's like the hidden cost, or, if we simplify it, we pay 1M and have NO parts wear during practice session.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Maxim Kotov @ March 20th 2006,07:46:39 )
IMHO we should't have both paying 1M for testing session and have car wear during it. It can be either wear of car parts, so it's like the hidden cost, or, if we simplify it, we pay 1M and have NO parts wear during practice session.
By paying 1M there is a small barrier to even start testing. Which is good. Mind you, this is 1M for the whole testsession and not per stint). By having ppl pay by wear (and thus by parts) its cheaper when you have a lower level car (lower groups) and more expensive with high level car (elite), which not only mimics real life (harder to make a good car excellent than a poor car good) but also help to balance the performance in the elite group.
If you only have the 1M to pay, it woudl way too cheap, though that can be changed per group, but also will oose its function as a strategic managers choice. With paying by wear, there is a direct relation between what you gain and what you pay. So its much more a trade off between how many laps you want to drive and what you get for it. If you pay a fixed ammount, then ppl will always run the maximum laps, which undermined the function of testing..its estimated that if you really put effort into testing, you can sort of double the car characters points! But since the point gotten from testing are subject to decay over time, you need to keep testing to maintain a level. Only time will tell what a good strategy is.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the test fee should be changed by group - what is very cheap for elite may be quite expensive for a lower group
|
|
|
|
|
why? let me see... because it is confusing? because it is inconsistent? because we care more about information we give to competitors than to the players themselves:) how about that for a reason:)
|
|
|
|
|
The Testing Standings say that I've done 90 laps of testing, whereas I've actually done 95. Small bug there somewhere.
|
|
|
|
I think it depends on whether you actually finished the lap, as it's possible to not fuel for enough laps and stop short.
This would give you the laps you asked for, but you would have actually completed less of them.
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Pirate
