Page « 1 2 3 ... 115 [116117 ... 191 192 193 » Quick go to page:
Author Topic: Suggestions 5783 replies
Ania Piekarska
(Group Amateur - 9)



Posts: 713
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3451 posted Feb 19th 2019, 19:16:28 Quote 
I'd like to bring the attention back to the original suggestion of Rastislav: no special characters in Driver/TD names. The initial assumption about manager names being incorrect doesn't invalidate the main idea.

In case there comes a question why bother. In the csv market sheet (possibly other too), all special characters get replaced by their code (e.g. driver Robert Müller /gb/DriverProfile.asp?ID=20089 is shown as Robert Müller to me). This results in annoying things when processing the file. I usually just remove the name column but still find it annoying.
Miel Soeterbroek
(Group Master - 3)



Posts: 3107
  Country:
Netherlands 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3452 posted Feb 19th 2019, 19:34:16 Quote 
Ania, they're HTML entities representing those odd characters.

Don't know how you're "processing" the file but most (if not all) programming languages have some form of library to encode/decode these.
Sébastien Boulanger
(Group Amateur - 79)



Posts: 1191
  Country:
France 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3453 posted Feb 19th 2019, 19:50:44 Quote 
Quote ( Miel Soeterbroek @ February 19th 2019,19:34:16 )

Ania, they're HTML entities representing those odd characters.

Don't know how you're "processing" the file but most (if not all) programming languages have some form of library to encode/decode these.
yes but when you dowload à csv file it was encoded with a character set and html code wasn't one of them...
Miel Soeterbroek
(Group Master - 3)



Posts: 3107
  Country:
Netherlands 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3454 posted Feb 19th 2019, 20:05:17 Quote 
Well i do agree there Sebastien, html encoded entities have very little purpose in a CSV :)

I assume the XLS export came first here, which is nothing but a HTML table really, and the other exports were based on that one. That or the driver names are html encoded at their very source (a database far far away)


Ania Piekarska
(Group Amateur - 9)



Posts: 713
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3455 posted Feb 19th 2019, 20:09:49 Quote 
Quote ( Miel Soeterbroek @ February 19th 2019,19:34:16 )

Don't know how you're "processing" the file but most (if not all) programming languages have some form of library to encode/decode these.
This helps if I interpret the whole file structure, but I'm rather thinking of one-line scripts. An example from the top of my head, filtering the file on the second number in each line (usually should be OA, but is 252 in the provided case) to be below league limit.

I also sometimes shoot myself in the foot when I import the file to Excel and forget changing the characters for fields splitting and realize that my whole file is shifted only after spending some time on it. That's obviously my fault, but it's still annoying to be defeated by something that doesn't have to be there.
Rastislav Padysak
(Group Rookie - 121)


Posts: 611
  Country:
Slovakia 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3456 posted Feb 19th 2019, 20:53:49 (last edited Feb 19th 2019, 20:54:46 by Rastislav Padysak) Quote 
Quote ( Ania Piekarska @ February 19th 2019,19:16:28 )...
In case there comes a question why bother. In the csv market sheet (possibly other too), all special characters get replaced by their code (e.g. driver Robert Müller /gb/DriverProfile.asp?ID=20089 is shown as Robert Müller to me). This results in annoying things when processing the file. I usually just remove the name column but still find it annoying.
The similar problem (html encoding string in the name) is with the managers' names when you want to download png image of the Lap chart. I have reported it some time ago but GPRO couldn't fix it then. ...But I didn't want to take the topic to this point today.
Maxim Kotov2
(Group Elite)



Posts: 1148
  Country:
Russian Federation 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3457 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 16:34:55 Quote 
I would like to see tyres in the Qualify Statistics page.
/gb/QualifyStats.asp
Maxim Kotov2
(Group Elite)



Posts: 1148
  Country:
Russian Federation 
Certified: 
Like this post (5)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3458 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 17:21:50 Quote 
It would be nice if we were allowed to downgrade 0% worn parts (in order to get better PHA Matching). Currently it is impossible to downgrade a brand new part.
Dainius Vaškys
(Group Pro - 7)



Posts: 654
  Country:
Lithuania 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3459 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 18:26:00 Quote 
Quote ( Maxim Kotov @ February 23rd 2019,17:21:50 )

It would be nice if we were allowed to downgrade 0% worn parts (in order to get better PHA Matching). Currently it is impossible to downgrade a brand new part.

Why the hell that would be beneficial to downgrade brand new part, when after that race you will have to buy it or downgrade even more in order to race without smoking ...
Sven Bojkowski
(Group Amateur - 80)


Posts: 1207
  Country:
Sweden 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3460 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 18:38:23 Quote 
Quote ( Maxim Kotov @ February 23rd 2019,17:21:50 )

It would be nice if we were allowed to downgrade 0% worn parts (in order to get better PHA Matching). Currently it is impossible to downgrade a brand new part.


We are allowed to do that already. Nothing stopped you from downgrading it last season.
Jasper Coosemans1
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 3021
  Country:
Belgium 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3461 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 18:49:25 (last edited Feb 23rd 2019, 18:51:04 by Jasper Coosemans) Quote 
His wishes for Race 17 may have stopped him from doing that.

Besides, the same issue exists in case you had a start crash.
Lucas Lobico
(Group Pro - 4)



Posts: 820
  Country:
Spain 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3462 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 19:41:17 Quote 
Quote ( Dainius Vaškys @ February 23rd 2019,18:26:00 )

Why the hell that would be beneficial to downgrade brand new part, when after that race you will have to buy it or downgrade even more in order to race without smoking ...

He says it in his same post:

Quote ( Maxim Kotov @ February 23rd 2019,17:21:50 )

...(in order to get better PHA Matching)...

If PHA has become more important now, I guess it makes a perfect reason, and while you can do it in every other race between R1 and R17, not being able to do it between R17 and R1 makes it not possible to maintain a 'continue' PHA car / track adjustment.

So, if the PHA in the tracks differ between both tracks, you can make downgrades (or upgrades) to adjust the car for the R17 track, but then you can't do it for R1, being forced anyways to maintain for R1 the same PHA you prepared for R17 (regarding parts levels at least).

Yep, this would extend the 'problem'. You can also +upgrade+ parts before races to adjust PHA. So, a fix to ensure adaptation continuity between R17 and R1 should consider both options, to be fair.

Since upgrading just after R17 could be somewhat potentially 'exploited' depending on cases (for instance, to reduce casual taxes paid, or indeed to relegate if balance would become negative), it might have sense (or at least I don't see a reason not to) to allow it after the season reset, like a normal parts adjustment between any other races.
Roland Postle10
(Group Elite)



Posts: 1855
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3463 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:03:47 Quote 
To ensure proper continuity we should not have parts reset to 0% wear over the reset, it just messes up our matching.. as it is now it's impossible to arrange to have high wear on certain parts in race 1.

Am I helping this argument? :) *runs*
Sven Bojkowski
(Group Amateur - 80)


Posts: 1207
  Country:
Sweden 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3464 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:10:33 Quote 
Quote ( Jasper Coosemans @ February 23rd 2019,18:49:25 )

His wishes for Race 17 may have stopped him from doing that.


His wishes for R17 could have taken into account his wishes for R1. Choosing between R17 and R1, he went with change the rules. An odd move but well in line with a trend I've seen on the forum lately.
Jasper Coosemans1
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 3021
  Country:
Belgium 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3465 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:11:09 (last edited Feb 23rd 2019, 20:12:31 by Jasper Coosemans) Quote 
Right, the magical rejuvenation of parts during the season reset should be optional. :)

Edit-
@Sven: tell me one good reason why it should not be possible to downgrade fresh parts.
Sven Bojkowski
(Group Amateur - 80)


Posts: 1207
  Country:
Sweden 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3466 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:18:57 (last edited Feb 23rd 2019, 20:19:51 by Sven Bojkowski) Quote 
Well, it's not like he didn't know what part he would start the season with or that he couldn't downgrade it. If his season depends on this race and on having that part downgraded, he should have planned better.

I also don't think the burden of evidence should be on the one suggesting the rule should stay the same. Show me a valid argument in favor of his suggestion.

His argument is "I would be faster in the race if you changed the rule", but wouldn't that be the case for everyone around him as well?

Isn't it then more interesting to have some managers plan ahead and downgrade the part while it was still possible and let them reap the benefits in R1, while Kotov could enjoy a slight advantage in R17 by not downgrading?

Do we not get better racing with that setup than if we let everyone have identical cars and identical strategies?

Nothing is broken. Don't fix it.
Jasper Coosemans1
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 3021
  Country:
Belgium 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3467 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:30:02 Quote 
It is broken - you cannot downgrade fresh parts after a start crash, which means you get punished 2 races in a row.

You say the argument for the change is because Kotov would be faster, but I'm afraid to say you made that up all by yourself because he didn't say anything like that at all...
Sven Bojkowski
(Group Amateur - 80)


Posts: 1207
  Country:
Sweden 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3468 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:32:24 Quote 
You're right. He was probably looking to match PHA better by downgrading parts in order to go slower...
Mikko Heikkinen
(Group Master - 3)



Posts: 12503
  Country:
Finland 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3469 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 20:54:05 (last edited Feb 23rd 2019, 20:56:48 by Mikko Heikkinen) Quote 
Quote ( Jasper Coosemans @ February 23rd 2019,20:30:02 )

would be faster, but I'm afraid to say you made that up all by yourself because he didn't say anything like that at all...

Any person with a single intelligent bone in them and capability to form thoughts can see it even if he didn't directly say it


Quote ( Sven Bojkowski @ February 23rd 2019,20:32:24 )

You're right. He was probably looking to match PHA better by downgrading parts in order to go slower...

:LOL:
Jasper Coosemans1
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 3021
  Country:
Belgium 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3470 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 21:27:49 Quote 
Quote ( Sven Bojkowski @ February 23rd 2019,20:32:24 )

You're right. He was probably looking to match PHA better by downgrading parts in order to go slower...

He proposed a modification to a game mechanic which would be available to everyone. You then turn it into a personal argument by saying he's proposing it for selfish reasons, for his own benefit. Your argument makes no sense at all. Now can you puh-lease come up with an answer related only to the content of the suggestion without making it personal?

Quote ( Mikko Heikkinen @ February 23rd 2019,20:54:05 )

Any person with a single intelligent bone in them and capability to form thoughts can see it even if he didn't directly say it

I'm lucky my brain is not in my bones then.
Edwin Silva
(Group Master - 3)



Posts: 2235
  Country:
Colombia 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3471 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 21:35:46 Quote 
While we are at this, we could also make another rule about hammering and puncturing parts in order to make them more worn at will.

On a serious note, it is strange you can downgrade a 1% worn part (I assume you can) whereas you can't do the same with a new one. It's silly as hell we are living in an era in which downgrading a new or almost new part is the way to go, but we are already there. The downgrading thingy ability is peanuts within this madness.
Maxim Kotov2
(Group Elite)



Posts: 1148
  Country:
Russian Federation 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3472 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 21:39:36 Quote 
So many words, guys.. come on!
I just wanted to do some research - compare my net times before and after downgrading some part(s). Of course I had an option to do 1 stint of testing and then downgrade my part, but I just thought why shouldn't I be able to do it with a brand new one? It was not really that important to me in terms of speed gain. So there were no selfish reasons - just trying to make a game better for everyone :)
Gabriel Arbona
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 968
  Country:
Argentina 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3473 posted Feb 23rd 2019, 22:08:06 Quote 
You can not plan a whole season just because you have a degraded part without spending, I wonder in any case if it would not be interesting to use the parts used to take advantage of them in the tests?
Tomek Kiełpiński
(Group Elite)



Posts: 5682
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3474 posted Feb 24th 2019, 09:44:40 (last edited Feb 24th 2019, 09:45:23 by Tomek Kiełpiński) Quote 
NVM
David Andrewartha
(Group Amateur - 6)



Posts: 1430
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (6)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3475 posted Feb 24th 2019, 18:06:20 Quote 
Just something I noticed looking through the tutorials for new managers. On the driver information section there is no mention of favourite tracks and their effect on driver performance. It may seem obvious to us old hands but it could be a useful addition for new managers.
Chris Shaw
(Group Pro - 25)



Posts: 901
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3476 posted Feb 24th 2019, 19:20:58 Quote 
Request: The ability to see the current weather conditions when no driver is signed. It might influence your choice of signing...
Max Watson
(Group Elite)



Posts: 5184
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3477 posted Feb 24th 2019, 19:26:48 Quote 
Quote ( Chris Shaw @ February 24th 2019,19:20:58 )

Request: The ability to see the current weather conditions when no driver is signed. It might influence your choice of signing...


/gb/weatherforecast.asp
Chris Shaw
(Group Pro - 25)



Posts: 901
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (5)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3478 posted Feb 24th 2019, 20:01:59 Quote 
Quote ( Max Watson @ February 24th 2019,19:26:48 )

Quote ( Chris Shaw @ February 24th 2019,19:20:58 )

Request: The ability to see the current weather conditions when no driver is signed. It might influence your choice of signing...

/gb/weatherforecast.asp


Suggestion: make the link to that in 500pt font? More serious suggestion: It's not the most intuitive place to look for it, not that it's particularly hidden but it'd be easier if we just have access to the practice tab which is where most people would first think to look. obviously the practice buttons would need locking, but that to me is better than blocking the link to the full page.

Anyway, cheers Max
Gavin Bosence
(Group Amateur - 15)



Posts: 323
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #3479 posted Feb 24th 2019, 22:59:17 (last edited Feb 24th 2019, 23:04:50 by Gavin Bosence) Quote 
Idea
Can we have the "Testing standings" tab Highlighted in yellow when other managers do testing as with other tabs like forums, q1 and q2 standings, etc etc
Mikko Heikkinen
(Group Master - 3)



Posts: 12503
  Country:
Finland 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #3480 posted Feb 24th 2019, 23:56:04 Quote 
Quote ( Gavin Bosence @ February 24th 2019,22:59:17 )

Can we have the "Testing standings" tab Highlighted in yellow when other managers do testing as with other tabs like forums, q1 and q2 standings, etc etc

testing shouldn't be advertised, as is with other things like when people doing car&other stuff update isn't advertised
Page « 1 2 3 ... 115 [116117 ... 191 192 193 » Quick go to page:

Reply to this topic