Grand Prix Racing Online Forum > Suggestions forum > Increase number of team members Add this topic to your ignore list Add this topic to your watchlist
Page [12 3 4 5 6 » Quick go to page:
Forum topic poll
Max number of team members:
Sign in to vote or view the poll results
Author Topic: Increase number of team members 161 replies
Leandro Sereno7
(Group Elite)



Posts: 1314
  Country:
Brazil 
Certified: 
Like this post (49)   Dislike this post (19)
Old post #1 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:39:09 Quote 
Hi admins and all GPRO community,

Dont know if this has been discussed before, but I would like to ask what everyone think about increase number of team members.

I know since the beginning we have 10 members at max and this change can modify a bit team statistics like most points and some others. However, with time the game has become very large and so on number of teams. Some teams have 2-3 subteams and share an external forum like a just one big team.

So, this idea came to my mind and I believe Its very easy to implement. To avoid big increase I'd suggest 12 members, but feel free to vote in the poll and make comments.
Jensen Owens
(Group Rookie - 239)



Posts: 6400
  Country:
Wales 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #2 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:39:48 Quote 
YEAH i LIKE 12 :-)
Krasen Belev
(Group Pro - 18)



Posts: 4123
  Country:
Bulgaria 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #3 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:41:24 Quote 
Like. We can easy see that 10 members per team is low now, a lot teams are going for 2nd team, so why not.
Shoaib Mohamed
(Group Elite)



Posts: 9817
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (16)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #4 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:43:07 Quote 
Quote ( Leandro Sereno @ November 14th 2014,16:39:09 )

Hi admins and all GPRO community,

Dont know if this has been discussed before, but I would like to ask what everyone think about increase number of team members.

I know since the beginning we have 10 members at max and this change can modify a bit team statistics like most points and some others. However, with time the game has become very large and so on number of teams. Some teams have 2-3 subteams and share an external forum like a just one big team.

So, this idea came to my mind and I believe Its very easy to implement. To avoid big increase I'd suggest 12 members, but feel free to vote in the poll and make comments.
Yes please :{) I personally voted for 14.

How I think it should be implemented is to continue having only 10 scoring members. Now these 10 members could either be nominated at the start of the season or they could be nominated for each race (my choice).

That way teams would be a whole lot more fun, but there wouldn't necessarily be pressure to recruit more than 10 people if you don't want to.
Yucel Kat
(Group Amateur - 24)



Posts: 607
  Country:
Turkey 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #5 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:44:33 Quote 
Prefer 20 each team ;)
Jack Wemyss
(Group Rookie - 24)



Posts: 8061
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (69)   Dislike this post (4)
Old post #6 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:45:55 Quote 
Imagine if some kid in Rookie suggested this.
Christoph Seifriedsberger
(Group Master - 5)



Posts: 6825
  Country:
Austria 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #7 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:47:03 Quote 
Voted 12, but I'm not sure how many I'd like to have. Having a few more team members would be nice tho.
Andres Felipe Sanchez
(Group Amateur - 1)



Posts: 1160
  Country:
Colombia 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #8 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:49:18 Quote 
I've voted for 16, we have to see that some teams (Like Torque Latinoamerica Racing) have 2nd team (Torque 1 Latinoamerica Racing), and IMHO could be better if we have more team members :)
Daneks Britāls
(Group Amateur - 5)



Posts: 14044
  Country:
Latvia 
Certified: 
Like this post (8)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #9 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:51:20 Quote 
Other option. 10 is too much.
Mike Brummert
(Group Amateur - 58)



Posts: 5012
  Country:
United States 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #10 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:52:02 (last edited Nov 14th 2014, 17:01:16 by Mike Brummert) Quote 
Quote ( Jack Wemyss @ November 14th 2014,16:45:55 )

Imagine if some kid in Rookie suggested this.



I'm very sure that I saw someone get absolutely blasted for suggesting this not to very long ago.

/gb/forum/ViewTopic.asp?TopicId=10353&Page=1
Sudeep Pednekar
(Group Amateur - 23)


Posts: 698
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #11 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:52:20 Quote 
There are many sister teams but there are also many many teams which are only half filled or lower than that, increasing the no.of spots will just result in the already established top 100 teams become unbeatble.
Jon Day
(Group Rookie - 219)


Posts: 10019
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #12 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:52:25 Quote 
Quote ( Jack Wemyss @ November 14th 2014,16:45:55 )

Imagine if some kid in Rookie suggested this.
But you didnt. :P
Steffen Holm
(Group Pro - 8)



Posts: 1001
  Country:
Denmark 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #13 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:54:27 Quote 
I think 12 would be fine, but this should be the max number of members.

But it would require 7 or 8 supporters, to run a teamforum and a Team livery.
Finn Shaw-McIver
(Group Pro - 12)



Posts: 22386
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #14 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:54:52 (last edited Nov 14th 2014, 16:55:03 by Finn Shaw-McIver) Quote 
I'd rather get rid of some members. I vote for a decrease
Finn Shaw-McIver
(Group Pro - 12)



Posts: 22386
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #15 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:55:56 Quote 
actually though, the prospect of everyone recruiting at the same time and me having to be at my best is extremely exciting. I vote for 12
Daneks Britāls
(Group Amateur - 5)



Posts: 14044
  Country:
Latvia 
Certified: 
Like this post (2)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #16 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:56:23 Quote 
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 14th 2014,16:54:52 )


I'd rather get rid of some members. I vote for a decrease


You grew up a bit finally
Tomek Kiełpiński
(Group Elite)



Posts: 5682
  Country:
Poland 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #17 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:56:58 Quote 
We have 2 teams and 20 members. Only option to not kick someone out is 20, but 20 is too much for 1 team. So I wouldn't change anything :-)
Luca Bertani
(Group Amateur - 48)



Posts: 3580
  Country:
Italy 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #18 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:57:49 Quote 
I vote for 12 as well ; not difficult to implement and nice suggestion.

+1 Leandro , good one.
Joe Manifold
(Group Amateur - 81)



Posts: 12472
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (2)
Old post #19 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:58:42 Quote 
Quote ( Jack Wemyss @ November 14th 2014,16:45:55 )

Imagine if some kid in Rookie suggested this.


It was (albeit 5 years ago), and got an overall no.

/gb/forum/ViewTopic.asp?TopicId=10353
Marcelo Ascencio
(Group Pro - 7)



Posts: 6153
  Country:
Argentina 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #20 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:58:46 Quote 
for some teams is not easy to get 10 members.

Christoph Seifriedsberger
(Group Master - 5)



Posts: 6825
  Country:
Austria 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #21 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:58:52 Quote 
Quote ( Tomek Kiełpiński @ November 14th 2014,16:56:58 )

We have 2 teams and 20 members. Only option to not kick someone out is 20, but 20 is too much for 1 team. So I wouldn't change anything :-)


Or you can just keep 20 in total in two teams even if 12 per team would be possible. Or you could even recruit some more ;p
Finn Shaw-McIver
(Group Pro - 12)



Posts: 22386
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (11)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #22 posted Nov 14th 2014, 16:58:59 Quote 
Quote ( Daneks Britāls @ November 14th 2014,16:56:23 )

You grew up a bit finally

I'm like you when you were a little girl
Jack Wemyss
(Group Rookie - 24)



Posts: 8061
  Country:
England 
Certified: 
Like this post (8)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #23 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:05:03 Quote 
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 14th 2014,16:58:59 )

Quote ( Daneks Britāls @ November 14th 2014,16:56:23 )

You grew up a bit finally
I'm like you when you were a little girl


I know where Daneks has got his hairstyle influence from

http://tinyurl.com/mhxayw8
Rogerio Pereira
(Group Amateur - 13)



Posts: 3346
  Country:
Brazil 
Certified: 
Like this post (4)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #24 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:05:40 Quote 
I voted 12, but 14 would be equaly (actually, more to be honest) interesting.

+1 to "only 10 members scoring". This can be similar to Nations Knockout cup where only the points of top 30 counts.

Therefore, only points of top 10 scoring team members would count for team standings.
Ajinkya Gokhale
(Group Pro - 9)



Posts: 2063
  Country:
India 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #25 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:07:05 Quote 
Quote ( Steffen Holm @ November 14th 2014,16:54:27 )

But it would require 7 or 8 supporters, to run a teamforum and a Team livery.


This sounds a valid argument....changing the number of members will involve all these other parameters to the team as well, which might not be as easy as it sounds. It might be easy to implement, but the effects might be more
Christoph Seifriedsberger
(Group Master - 5)



Posts: 6825
  Country:
Austria 
Certified: 
Like this post (3)   Dislike this post (1)
Old post #26 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:08:14 Quote 
Quote ( Rogerio Pereira @ November 14th 2014,17:05:40 )

Therefore, only points of top 10 scoring team members would count for team standings.


I'm not so sure whether this would be the "best" option as it might favour the "top teams". I'd rather go with an average of all members multiplied by 10.
Shane Ferguson
(Group Pro - 24)


Posts: 1404
  Country:
United States 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #27 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:13:14 Quote 
Quote ( Finn Shaw-McIver @ November 14th 2014,16:58:59 )

Quote ( Daneks Britāls @ November 14th 2014,16:56:23 )

You grew up a bit finally
I'm like you when you were a little girl



Umm sorry but looks to me like you would need to shave and wear a pretty little dress :p
Baptiste Cua
(Group Amateur - 58)


Posts: 542
  Country:
France 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #28 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:15:17 Quote 
But if the numbers of team member change, the number of supporter to have the team livery change?
Andres Urrea
(Group Amateur - 62)



Posts: 69
  Country:
Venezuela 
Certified: 
Like this post (0)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #29 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:18:46 Quote 
I vote for 12
Perry Christensen
(Group Amateur - 15)



Posts: 341
  Country:
Denmark 
Certified: 
Like this post (1)   Dislike this post (0)
Old post #30 posted Nov 14th 2014, 17:19:06 Quote 
Quote ( Steffen Holm @ November 14th 2014,16:54:27 )

But it would require 7 or 8 supporters, to run a teamforum and a Team livery.

That could kill the small teams. Getting new members will be so much harder.
Page [12 3 4 5 6 » Quick go to page:
Grand Prix Racing Online Forum > Suggestions forum > Increase number of team members Add this topic to your ignore list Add this topic to your watchlist

Reply to this topic