| Author |
Topic: Who has the easiest rookie group? |
42 replies
|
|
|
|
#1 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:43:50
|
Quote
|
|
I was wondering you guys thoughts on the easiest rookie groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:46:28
|
Quote
|
|
One of the ones with 10 active managers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:46:58
|
Quote
|
|
R106 was the easiest last season, that's why I chose it. :)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Virgil Gardner @ June 28th 2010,16:43:50 )
I was wondering you guys thoughts on the easiest rookie groups.
Mine :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:48:21
|
Quote
|
|
37 forever! hard to leave :(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:48:45
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Michael Winkley @ June 28th 2010,16:47:36 )
Nothing to do with you starting a thread then getting picked up on not following your own posting rules?
(a question ;p)
In that post when I said to Samoeni dont spam that wasn't part of the topic the other one was
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:53:33
|
Quote
|
|
My group rk24 is pretty easy I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 posted Jun 28th 2010, 16:56:17
|
Quote
|
|
The one that no-one promotes from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 posted Jun 28th 2010, 17:01:56
|
Quote
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 posted Jun 28th 2010, 17:11:04
|
Quote
|
|
|
|
[Several posts deleted]
We have already had enough threads regarding R66. Please stay on topic opposed to going down that route again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 posted Jun 28th 2010, 17:25:59
|
Quote
|
|
It must be easy though Chris. I must be really missing something in this game of that sort of thing is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 posted Jun 29th 2010, 02:00:36
|
Quote
|
|
The easiest group will be the one that has the lowest ranked promoter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 posted Jun 29th 2010, 05:33:56
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Michael Winkley @ June 29th 2010,02:00:36 )
The easiest group will be the one that has the lowest ranked promoter. umm thats kinda where your wrong... if they have a low score.. there are obviously other people scoring points.. its more about how many contenders
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 posted Jun 29th 2010, 05:57:09
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Riley Morrell @ June 29th 2010,05:33:56 )
umm thats kinda where your wrong... if they have a low score.. there are obviously other people scoring points.. its more about how many contenders
If that's the case then how do you define contender? There are a handful of contenders to win races in my group (out of the regular 15 or so that race most of the time), but most of them will likely end in negative numbers financially. It's relatively easy to win races if you want to go all out, but you'll burn so much money that you may not promote (or likely will not be successful if you do).
So is it contending for wins or for promotion that makes one a contender?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 posted Jun 29th 2010, 06:42:23
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Mcferrin @ June 29th 2010,05:57:09 )
for promotion i guess..
Quote ( Kevin Mcferrin @ June 29th 2010,05:57:09 )
It's relatively easy to win races if you want to go all out, if you go on to money and car levels you can tell who is going all out and who you wont have to worrry about because of negativity.. my car is lvl 4 almost level 5.. but i have tonnes of cash, i for sure am a contender in my group.. the contenders really.. at this stage are peope with around 20 points or higher with a fiar bit of money to play with.. dont count them out just yet..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 posted Jun 29th 2010, 06:44:08
|
Quote
|
|
I think mines the easiest numbers 2-4 stay in flux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 posted Jun 29th 2010, 07:00:13
|
Quote
|
Roockie 33 has been a blessing, the only competition i had seems to left the game three races ago.
is incredibly easy :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 posted Jun 29th 2010, 07:03:39
|
Quote
|
|
going off topic a little here, I think my rookie group 134 is one of the hardest. Last race, I lost by 10 minutes!!! The winner won by 1 and a half minutes. That's absurd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 posted Jun 29th 2010, 08:50:51
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Grant Coruch @ June 29th 2010,07:03:39 )
Last race, I lost by 10 minutes!!!
It's likely that this can be attributed to your relative inexperience, and your joining in the middle of the season when everyone else has developed their packages for the season.
I'd suggest you spend the rest of this season reading around and experimenting to see what you might need to do to become more competitive for the start of next season.
There are very few tough rookie groups, really. If we're strictly talking about tough to win, then obviously Roca with his near perfect-for-rookie driver is nigh on impossible to beat. If we're talking about tough to promote from, then I don't think there is such a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 posted Jun 29th 2010, 08:53:28
|
Quote
|
Well, this season I dunno, but it sure has to be something like my S16 Rookie-129 group..
11 contenders was more than average, out of which 2/3 failed every race.. so 8/9 players a race?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 posted Jun 29th 2010, 11:46:29
|
Quote
|
Quote ( Riley Morrell @ June 29th 2010,06:42:23 )
Quote ( Kevin Mcferrin @ June 29th 2010,05:57:09 )
It's relatively easy to win races if you want to go all out,
if you go on to money and car levels you can tell who is going all out and who you wont have to worrry about because of negativity.. my car is lvl 4 almost level 5.. but i have tonnes of cash, i for sure am a contender in my group.. the contenders really.. at this stage are peope with around 20 points or higher with a fiar bit of money to play with.. dont count them out just yet..
What are you trying to say with this statement? Only 5 managers in your group have level 4 cars, and only 2 have a positive balance. That is a relatively weak group in comparison to mine using your own methods of assessment; my group has 8 managers with level 4+ cars (mine is 2 CCPs short of being level 5, Roca's about 4-5 CCPs short of level 5), and only 1 has a negative balance.
I reckon the best way to assess the easiest/hardest Rookie groups would be on the relative performances of the managers once they hit Amateur level; how many promote to Pro, retain Amateur, relegate back to Rookie. Even that isn't the best manager given that you get similar threads to this one at Amateur level.
Strongest/Weakest is only important with regards to Elite and Master levels; that is where the game is at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 posted Jun 29th 2010, 13:09:18
|
Quote
|
|
The easiest Rookie group is Master 4.... ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 posted Jun 29th 2010, 13:12:59
|
Quote
|
Luke Frost
(Group Master - 4)
Posts: 2003
How did you celebrate the 2000th post? ;)
|
|
|
|
For the weakest rookie group, I would look at the slowest race time needed for the top 4, averaged throughout the season. Obviously, you would also have to filter out ppl who will end up in negative.
It's impossible to tell for sure, but based on last race R223 is definately "up there". 1h39:49~ was enough for 4th place, which would equal 10th place in my not very spectacular group. That's pretty terrible I think.
|
|
|
|
|
My Group is not to hard, only max 19 people competing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 posted Jul 16th 2010, 22:46:44
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Fatjol Lamçja @ June 28th 2010,16:47:12 )
Mine :)
of course!i won 3 races and i'll be promoted in my first season...so no doubt about it eheheh
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 posted Jul 16th 2010, 22:49:32
|
Quote
|
|
Next season it will be R66.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 posted Jul 16th 2010, 22:53:47
|
Quote
|
For Roca it will be yes. :P
He pwned you by going negative in the end hahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 posted Jul 16th 2010, 22:54:28
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Jessica Maldonado @ June 29th 2010,07:00:13 )
Roockie 33 has been a blessing, the only competition i had seems to left the game three races ago.
is incredibly easy :)
you have no competition Jessica
|
|
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
