| Author |
Topic: This is probably a bug. |
88 replies
|
|
|
How come fuel consumption on Montreal is bigger than on Interlagos ?
*My car parts were the same level in both races.
*My driver improved the skills between Interlagos(6) and last Montreal(8) race which usually help to reduce fuel consumption.
*Risks were the same.
Judjing from Go statistics consumption was bigger for almost 8 liters. How come?
Waiting for an aswer from the administrators.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:02:15 (last edited Dec 2nd 2011, 23:02:49 by Jun Ho)
|
Quote
|
Risks? Situation of the race?
Yeah, you were pumping faster lap times during Interlagos, whereas you were held up by people in Montreal. No bug here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:02:30
|
Quote
|
|
cue flurry of foby posts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:02:46
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:00:55 )
Waiting for an aswer from the administrators.
More likely to get a flaming from the public.
There are many reasons. Start with that consumption is not a blanket. Every track is different, regardless of "Normal", "Low", etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:03:32
|
Quote
|
You are kidding right???
Is the Faultwy Towers moment???
|
|
|
|
|
There is much more things that affect fuel consumption than You can imagine right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jun Ho @ December 2nd 2011,23:02:15 )
Risks? Situation of the race?
Yeah, you were pumping faster lap times during Interlagos, whereas you were held up by people in Montreal. No bug here.
Lol, what are you talking about?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:06:15
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:00:55 )
Topic: This is definitelly not a bug. :L
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:06:26
|
Quote
|
Imagine you need to name numbers from 1 to 30 with names "low", "medium", "high".
One possible way to do it is call numbers 1-10 "low", 11-20 "medium" and 21-30 "high".
Now let's say I told you 22 is "medium" and then told you 27 is "medium". And you say that I must be wrong because 27>22.
Do you see the analogy?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jeff Pumphrey @ December 2nd 2011,23:02:46 )
More likely to get a flaming from the public.
Exactly.
There are variances in consumption in the group that is called "medium consumption tracks".
E: Listen to Ania.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael, try to embrace the challenge of things not turning out quite how you expected rather than assume the game is not programmed correctly. Be more open minded to different styles of circuit even if they are in the same fuel catagory. That is my advice.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Ania Piekarska @ December 2nd 2011,23:06:26 )
Do you see the analogy?
No Ania because...
Quote ( Jeff Pumphrey @ December 2nd 2011,23:02:46 )
More likely to get a flaming from the public.
Like Zan said earlier!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:08:46 )
as I didn't pretend to be a clever *** whatever
But you made some really pompous statements and your horse was sky high. This attracts certain answers and attitude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 posted Dec 2nd 2011, 23:14:24 (last edited Dec 2nd 2011, 23:14:51 by Håkan Ferm)
|
Quote
|
|
Quote ( Serge Girard @ December 2nd 2011,23:12:23 )
Ania for President!
Serge for her Wife! :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jan Zaluski @ December 2nd 2011,23:12:55 )
But you made some really pompous statements and your horse was sky high.
Came on Zan, give the guy a break, or a change to, apologize the starting moment.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Arkadiusz Nicewicz @ December 2nd 2011,23:03:55 )
There is much more things that affect fuel consumption than You can imagine right now.
Oh, so just because you´re more experienced and in a higher group than him, you think you can treat him like that? I hate the arrogant people, and I won´t read things like that and just be quiet. You really need to have more respect to other people. Thumbs down for you
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jeff Pumphrey @ December 2nd 2011,23:02:46 )
More likely to get a flaming from the public.
If you can't say anything else just keep silence.
Quote ( Ania Piekarska @ December 2nd 2011,23:06:26 )
Imagine you need to name numbers from 1 to 30 with names "low", "medium", "high".
One possible way to do it is call numbers 1-10 "low", 11-20 "medium" and 21-30 "high".
Now let's say I told you 22 is "medium" and then told you 27 is "medium". And you say that I must be wrong because 27>22.
Do you see the analogy?
I won't believe that. In all my previous dry races I was able to count how much fuel will be consumped with accuracy not more than 1-2 liters, but not 8.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Håkan Ferm @ December 2nd 2011,23:14:24 )
Serge for her Wife! :D
lol Wanna see me in skirt? =)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
I won't believe that. In all my previous dry races I was able to count how much fuel will be consumped with accuracy not more than 1-2 liters, but not 8.
Your way of calculating fuel has errors then. That's what one should assume first, not that there's "definitely a bug".
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
If you can't say anything else just keep silence.
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
I won't believe that. In all my previous dry races I was able to count how much fuel will be consumped with accuracy not more than 1-2 liters, but not 8.
Quit while you are ahead mate :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
I won't believe that.
leave then :p
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
I won't believe that. In all my previous dry races I was able to count how much fuel will be consumped with accuracy not more than 1-2 liters, but not 8.
Look Michael, just to end this before you get more dirty words...
You should look much more deep then the fuel consumition, there are a lot of variables that can change all that, and that is what you should be focus on, not this war garbage thing, one more thing, you ask for respect, show somw yourself, you just did the same mistake you cry earlier, not palite!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
I won't believe that.
What was posted is absolutely the right answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Michael Ivanov @ December 2nd 2011,23:15:43 )
Quote ( Jeff Pumphrey @ December 2nd 2011,23:02:46 )
More likely to get a flaming from the public.
If you can't say anything else just keep silence.
This was a fair comment.
Michael the mixed response of this thread shows that jumping to conclusions is not the best course of action. Always think about your data before assuming the game is at fault.
|
|
|
|
I calculated that I would come 3rd & I came 7th.... but hey, I'll get over it....
... in time...
|
|
|
|
Wise move Hakan, wise move! :)
As for Arkadiusz, maybe people should stop giving him the thumb down. In case you did not notice, he edited his post and removed his unfortunate comment.
Peace! :)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Serge Girard @ December 2nd 2011,23:12:23 )
Ania for President
Here! here!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Serge Girard @ December 2nd 2011,23:20:50 )
As for Arkadiusz, maybe people should stop giving him the thumb down. In case you did not notice, he edited his post and removed his unfortunate comment.
I don't think he did the editing
e - but you are right peace
|
|
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Српски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
