Quote ( Daniel Mason @ November 25th 2016,01:38:31 )
No, you're a big girl boy, you can figure this out all by yourself. I'm not going to hold your hand through this.
I think, you just love to look clever :D :) I wrote an example, and I don't think that somebody know, how works the energy system..
BUT if you say that, "there is a logic", you should whisper it ;) after that I beleive you and I admit that,you know better this,than me..But you are in Ama and you are not strong,If you know the solution, why aren't you in PRO yet?
So..finally I just would like to make this system much more logical!PLEASE. :) I don't like to experience for example this:
Very-very similar drivers(only -/+ 2-3 difference at the skills) and same risk (last race) , and either lost 97% energy, other lost only 84%...this is very big difference and inexplicable (I think, this is not normal and random factor)
Second problem (tracks+drivers, opposite influences)
Quote ( Virgis Lyss @ November 24th 2016,21:20:54 )
Quote ( Veres Tamás @ November 24th 2016,13:29:00 )
Manager 1: (both of race use same risk) R1: he lost 68% energy, R2: he lost 63% energy Manager 2 ( both of race use same risk) R1: he lost 94% energy, R2: he lost 97% energy
Quote ( Veres Tamás @ November 25th 2016,01:58:42 )
I don't think that somebody know, how works the energy system..
Once again, I disagree. There's that word "FOBY" which is strongly valued here... Damn, I've never thought that I'd say that to someone.
But yeah, you've got to FOBY, buddy. I'm sure some smart individuals are figuring out how the system works, but they ain't sharing any info unless you're a close friend or team mate lol. Hell, if I find out how the energy works properly, I'll only share the info with my team mates.
This is the most FOBY I've ever given (in the forum) so pay attention, lady's.
Your OVER THINKING the situation.
The main problem is everyone's wanting FOBY because they have gotten comfortable with their team tools and they have either forgotten, or never learned not only how certain things work, but why. Now something new comes along and everyone is like...OMG, where's the tool for this. The tool is in your head, use it.
Quote ( Veres Tamás @ November 25th 2016,01:58:42 )
I think, you just love to look clever :D :) I wrote an example, and I don't think that somebody know, how works the energy system..
BUT if you say that, "there is a logic", you should whisper it ;) after that I beleive you and I admit that,you know better this,than me..But you are in Ama and you are not strong,If you know the solution, why aren't you in PRO yet?
So..finally I just would like to make this system much more logical!PLEASE. :) I don't like to experience for example this:
Very-very similar drivers(only -/+ 2-3 difference at the skills) and same risk (last race) , and either lost 97% energy, other lost only 84%...this is very big difference and inexplicable (I think, this is not normal and random factor)
Second problem (tracks+drivers, opposite influences)
Y'know what? You go right on ahead and keep banging your head against this wall. I thought you were intelligent enough to want to figure this out on your own, but I clearly overestimated you.
Quote ( Daniel Mason @ November 25th 2016,03:17:58 )
Y'know what? You go right on ahead and keep banging your head against this wall. I thought you were intelligent enough to want to figure this out on your own, but I clearly overestimated you.
Mate! Pls write reasons.. How do you explain the differences what I wrote? Where is the logic ? What do you experience? I'm interested in it, can you write me PM?
Quote ( Ken Neihart @ November 25th 2016,06:22:49 )
Quote ( Mario Badrov @ November 25th 2016,06:19:16 )
I don't think that 40 is some high risk.
No one said 40ct was high. He said if you have to use spa after every race, you should consider lowering your risk.
...actually with the introduction of "energy", 40 can be a high risk-depending on certain other attributes of the driver.
E: there was always a hint that 40 CT could be too high for a certain level- in my opinion this is not about the level per se but more about certain driver characteristics that could be carried on to the higher levels. I mean if you got crappy driver in Elite and maybe crappy other staff then 40 could still be too high for you.
Quote ( George Odhis @ November 25th 2016,07:32:19 )
...actually with the introduction of "energy", 40 can be a high risk-depending on certain other attributes of the driver.
E: there was always a hint that 40 CT could be too high for a certain level- in my opinion this is not about the level per se but more about certain driver characteristics that could be carried on to the higher levels. I mean if you got crappy driver in Elite and maybe crappy other staff then 40 could still be too high for you.
We'll just chock this up as you totally missing what I've said.
You are right Ken. But maybe I didn't miss what you were saying. I was just reinforcing what you had said. We are saying the same thing- only that you didn't emphasize that 40 could still be high for him.
Quote ( George Odhis @ November 25th 2016,07:46:46 )
You are right Ken. But maybe I didn't miss what you were saying. I was just reinforcing what you had said. We are saying the same thing- only that you didn't emphasize that 40 could still be high for him.
lol yeah I guess I'm the one that didn't understand ;)
Your are absolutely correct on 40ct maybe high for ama and that's what I like about the energy. If ppl would just take a second and realize when not having to run 100ct (a lot of ama were) it is actually a benefit to them, but they just can't get it through their heads.
Quote ( Veres Tamás @ November 24th 2016,13:29:00 )
you can't learn this, because there is NO logic. You can't predict, how many energy will be lost the next race for example with ct50 :P
There is no logic in your grammar. You can't predict "how many energy", because you should be looking at "how much energy", energy is an uncount noun. Oh! By the way, I do a pretty good job at predicting energy levels, I'm currently back up to 100%, and I haven't used SPA once this season. Tip: First season, so get records for next season.
Quote ( Brian Murphy @ November 25th 2016,08:09:54 )
There is no logic in your grammar. You can't predict "how many energy", because you should be looking at "how much energy", energy is an uncount noun. Oh! By the way, I do a pretty good job at predicting energy levels, I'm currently back up to 100%, and I haven't used SPA once this season. Tip: First season, so get records for next season.
Brian this is unnecessary, and not helpful to the thread. The game is international but people are required to communicate in english on the main forums, even when it is not their first language. I suspect that his ability with english is far superior to your ability with hungarian.
Quote ( Ken Neihart @ November 25th 2016,08:05:32 )
Your are absolutely correct on 40ct maybe high for ama and that's what I like about the energy. If ppl would just take a second and realize when not having to run 100ct (a lot of ama were) it is actually a benefit to them, but they just can't get it through their heads.
Quote ( Brian Murphy @ November 25th 2016,08:09:54 )
There is no logic in your grammar. You can't predict "how many energy", because you should be looking at "how much energy", energy is an uncount noun. Oh! By the way, I do a pretty good job at predicting energy levels, I'm currently back up to 100%, and I haven't used SPA once this season. Tip: First season, so get records for next season.
I was tired, but not the grammer is the most essential!
Quote ( Graham Mercer @ November 25th 2016,09:21:22 )
Brian this is unnecessary, and not helpful to the thread.The game is international but people are required to communicate in english on the main forums, even when it is not their first language.I suspect that his ability with english is far superior to your ability with hungarian.