Thi' Captain Spake |
Jabb'r: [FM 2016] Fantasy Team |
's many 's 924 answ'rs
|
|
Kevin, you can paste all that in Notepad and align it there, then copy/paste it back in code. It works. :)
Are we going to use the same submission form for round 2?
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Quote ( Lyee Chong @ June 4th 2016,04:39:12 ) Does FM2016's assistant manager also has certain stat/attribute to indicate how good he is? Can we edit their stat so that all managers get the "same" assistant manager, who are all equally bad :P
I'll make all assistant managers legends (through FMRTE)
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrei Ciuchi @ June 4th 2016,04:59:38 ) Kevin, you can paste all that in Notepad and align it there, then copy/paste it back in code. It works. :)
Are we going to use the same submission form for round 2?
I'll check if it works to align.
Submission form will be "updated" together with the available player's list. I'll throw out a PM once it's all ready.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I had a idea. For second draft, the order will be after number of players. So, a person with 4 players will be first, and the person with all 10 players will be last. Tiebreaker will be position in first draft. So, two managers have the same number of players, but one was second and the other manager was twenty second, the manager with 22 position in first draft to be in front of the second manager in first draft. P.S.: I don't have a good English.
|
|
|
I think Kevin has already decided and made the draft order for the 2nd round
Maybe he may take that as an idea for the third round of drafts though
|
|
|
Quote ( Peter Willmore @ June 4th 2016,10:32:31 ) I think Kevin has already decided and made the draft order for the 2nd round
He already made the order. See post #2.
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrei Harnicu @ June 4th 2016,10:29:14 ) I had a idea. For second draft, the order will be after number of players. So, a person with 4 players will be first, and the person with all 10 players will be last. Tiebreaker will be position in first draft. So, two managers have the same number of players, but one was second and the other manager was twenty second, the manager with 22 position in first draft to be in front of the second manager in first draft.
Quote ( Peter Willmore @ June 4th 2016,10:32:31 ) I think Kevin has already decided and made the draft order for the 2nd round
Maybe he may take that as an idea for the third round of drafts though
I've had the idea to do Andrei's plan as well, but that only came to mind after I announced the order would be from lowest value to highest value. But it's a good idea for next round indeed, the person with the lowest amount of players will end up first in line.
Although Chew Kai Wen did proof you don't need to be in front of the line to be able to get all your 10 players, as long as you pick "smart".
|
|
|
Quote ( Kevin Buis @ June 4th 2016,10:43:34 ) Quote ( Andrei Harnicu @ June 4th 2016,10:29:14 )
I had a idea. For second draft, the order will be after number of players. So, a person with 4 players will be first, and the person with all 10 players will be last. Tiebreaker will be position in first draft. So, two managers have the same number of players, but one was second and the other manager was twenty second, the manager with 22 position in first draft to be in front of the second manager in first draft.
Quote ( Peter Willmore @ June 4th 2016,10:32:31 )
I think Kevin has already decided and made the draft order for the 2nd round
Maybe he may take that as an idea for the third round of drafts though
I've had the idea to do Andrei's plan as well, but that only came to mind after I announced the order would be from lowest value to highest value. But it's a good idea for next round indeed, the person with the lowest amount of players will end up first in line.
Although Chew Kai Wen did proof you don't need to be in front of the line to be able to get all your 10 players, as long as you pick "smart".
Granted you can have 1 player that is worth more than 10 of another manager. So I think both ways are fair. Look at Andrei's squad, its not bad really... 4 players that are worth almost 200mil combined. Basically you can just aim for Messi/Ronaldo etc, and you'll probably only get 1 player but be rewarded with the first pick in the next round all the time due to your low player count. Going by money encouraged more different strategies to picking players if you ask me.
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
PM's sent to everyone, the draft round 2 is on! the deadline for the second round is monday 6 June at 20:00CET servertime
|
|
|
Most will go for top guns this time around because everyone saw, that top guns don't get picked :D
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrei Harnicu @ June 4th 2016,10:29:14 ) I had a idea. For second draft, the order will be after number of players. So, a person with 4 players will be first, and the person with all 10 players will be last. Tiebreaker will be position in first draft. So, two managers have the same number of players, but one was second and the other manager was twenty second, the manager with 22 position in first draft to be in front of the second manager in first draft. P.S.: I don't have a good English.
My own personal opinion on this...though being the person who got 10/10 I don't think anyone would take me seriously! :D
I think at least for the the 2nd to either the 3rd to 4th round of picks, the order should be determined by value. Why I feel this is mainly because we are still trying to achieve as even a playing field as possible to make the league as competitive as possible (unless you go for all lousy players, which makes it your fault then). As mentioned by Anders already, if we were to go by player count, this means that if I gun for 10 world class players and only come back with 4, I would potentially get one of the first picks in the second round and can come away with another good 2-3 top players. And with 600m in our bank to spend, you can definitely do that (I already planned my entire 25 man squad out and I still have no idea how to spend about 80m worth of cash after upgrading my reserves and subs lol). By going in terms of current squad value, it means that weaker teams have the opportunity to strengthen themselves and make the playing field more even, and that would then mean that our tactics would be what makes or break each match we play.
Of course, I'm not totally dissing Andrei's idea entirely. In later rounds, say round 5 onwards, I feel priority should be given to those with less players. That is mainly because the goal would be to quickly try and get all the managers to have their full squads, and also because by then, most of the top players should already have been taken and thus it wouldn't cause a massive upset in the playing field.
Just my 2 cents worth, from an obviously biased person. ;) But seriously, I am trying to be impartial here :D
|
|
|
Kevin, the form you sent me requires me to login to Google.
Not to mention in requires access permission.
Can you make it like it was for round 1, without logging in?
And the draft procedure is also requiring login.
|
|
|
Same here, Andrei. I sent by PM because I'll be leaving soon then I may not have time to do it later
|
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrei Ciuchi @ June 4th 2016,12:36:02 ) Kevin, the form you sent me requires me to login to Google.
Not to mention in requires access permission.
Can you make it like it was for round 1, without logging in?
let me check, it should be the same as round 1 :P
|
|
|
It isn't. I think there's some checks that need removed or something. :)
|
|
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Ok, was the part behind the last / that was wrong.. darnit.. need to mail everyone again xD
|
|
|
I've already done my part, so you can skip me on the list. :)
LOL there's the PM. Nevermind. :)
|
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
Quote ( Andrei Ciuchi @ June 4th 2016,12:55:02 ) LOL there's the PM. Nevermind. :)
Automated :P
|
|
|
Quote ( Chew Kai Wen @ June 4th 2016,12:24:27 ) Quote ( Andrei Harnicu @ June 4th 2016,10:29:14 )
I had a idea. For second draft, the order will be after number of players. So, a person with 4 players will be first, and the person with all 10 players will be last. Tiebreaker will be position in first draft. So, two managers have the same number of players, but one was second and the other manager was twenty second, the manager with 22 position in first draft to be in front of the second manager in first draft. P.S.: I don't have a good English.
My own personal opinion on this...though being the person who got 10/10 I don't think anyone would take me seriously! :D
I think at least for the the 2nd to either the 3rd to 4th round of picks, the order should be determined by value. Why I feel this is mainly because we are still trying to achieve as even a playing field as possible to make the league as competitive as possible (unless you go for all lousy players, which makes it your fault then). As mentioned by Anders already, if we were to go by player count, this means that if I gun for 10 world class players and only come back with 4, I would potentially get one of the first picks in the second round and can come away with another good 2-3 top players. And with 600m in our bank to spend, you can definitely do that (I already planned my entire 25 man squad out and I still have no idea how to spend about 80m worth of cash after upgrading my reserves and subs lol). By going in terms of current squad value, it means that weaker teams have the opportunity to strengthen themselves and make the playing field more even, and that would then mean that our tactics would be what makes or break each match we play.
Of course, I'm not totally dissing Andrei's idea entirely. In later rounds, say round 5 onwards, I feel priority should be given to those with less players. That is mainly because the goal would be to quickly try and get all the managers to have their full squads, and also because by then, most of the top players should already have been taken and thus it wouldn't cause a massive upset in the playing field.
Just my 2 cents worth, from an obviously biased person. ;) But seriously, I am trying to be impartial here :D
Yes, this is quite accurately what my thought was as well... once people start getting their squads filled up, then lets just go by player count and get it going. At that point there are probably not too many world class payers left and there's so many "decent-to-good" players that we hopefully dont pick the same players.
|
|
|
|
Kevin Buis (Squadron Master - 4)
|
|
Shiver me timbers! Topic mod Postin's: 1175 Home Port: Treasure hunt'r:
|
|
|
already got eleven entries, kudos!
If the other eleven send it before the deadline, I'll do the draft right after the last participant sends it!
|
|
|
Can you please give me at least 7 of my picks? I'd really appreciate it. Thanks.
Just kidding. I'll wait for the draft. :)
|
|
|
I really hope I get my number 1... All the rest are pretty expendable but number 1 is key!
|
|
|
I really want number 1 too.
|
|
|
Working on my picks right now. Gonna have them sent in tonight
|
|