| Аутор |
Тема: Qualify 1 and 2 in rookies |
34 одговора
|
|
|
|
Right now, we have more managers who've done Q2 then Q1 in the rookies. I guess this is a bug. Just wanted to bring this up. Thanks, goodnight, bye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have 19 who have finished Q1 and 18 who have finished Q2.
What on earth are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it has happened before that 2 managers had the same time and it was a top 10 time, the time of one of them wasn't there so maybe that happened with those rookies
|
|
|
|
Oh, I just looked at his rookie group. :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Would anyone be crazy enough to go straight to Q2 and bypass Q1? Don't think this is even possible.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Tim Lord @ October 4th 2012,22:58:58 ) Would anyone be crazy enough to go straight to Q2 and bypass Q1? Don't think this is even possible.
I don't think it's possible either :p.
I'm waiting for someone to go through all the rookie groups and count for both Q1 and Q2 now...
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, start coumting. Good luck, by the way...
|
|
|
|
|
Shotgun not me counting ;)
|
|
|
|
|
I ran out of fingers half way through R1 :P
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Pedro Diogo @ October 4th 2012,22:57:51 ) it has happened before that 2 managers had the same time and it was a top 10 time, the time of one of them wasn't there so maybe that happened with those rookies
That bug is just that when a manager is tied 10th but is 11th in the list, there is no extra row added for him like it should be. But he is still counted for the total number.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you guys! Now I know how to cheat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Nazir Ali @ October 4th 2012,23:47:51 ) Fixed I think. Can they change it back? I'm no longer in pole position!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Nazir Ali @ October 4th 2012,23:47:51 ) Fixed I think.
Or just Q1 had caught up with people doing Q2? It's still the same, or at least from where I am.
|
|
|
|
|
Not totally fixed, still 3 guys who have only done Q1 apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
It's now showing me a difference of 9...
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:06:49 ) Not totally fixed, still 3 guys who have only done Q1 apparently. Not fixed at all, I would say! I'm still no longer in pole position. Where is admin?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Alexander Holsteiner @ October 5th 2012,00:16:06 ) I'm still no longer in pole position.
A good explanation for that is someone else has just done Q2 and beaten you...
Thanks Jed and Joe for disliking me but look for yourselves, he has been beaten in Q2 and that's why he does not have poll.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:38:04 )
A good explanation for that is someone else has just done Q2 and beaten you...
Another great post from Steven Tindle who managed to read almost all of the words this time!
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:38:04 ) Quote ( Alexander Holsteiner @ October 5th 2012,00:16:06 )
I'm still no longer in pole position.
A good explanation for that is someone else has just done Q2 and beaten you...
This is admins fault!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Alexander Holsteiner @ October 5th 2012,00:42:07 ) This is admins fault!
Really don't understand how 'you not being on pole' is related to the bug related to counting how many people have done Q1 and Q2...
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:38:04 ) Thanks Jed and Joe for disliking me but look for yourselves, he has been beaten in Q2 and that's why he does not have poll.
Because it may have been sarcasm? Or at least sounds like it. Or he didn't notice that the other guy who beat him (sorry haven't checked for their name) by exactly a second and didn't notice it, thinking it was the same time because at a quick look the number 5 looks like the number 6, and he may think it's a bug. Who knows?
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:38:04 )
Thanks Jed and Joe for disliking me but look for yourselves, he has been beaten in Q2 and that's why he does not have poll.
Thanks for donating to GPRO to find out that, let me explain this to you in a idiot-proof way:
Alexander qualified and was not quickest, Alexander looks at the qualifying stats, Alexander comments on an anomaly on the page, Users tell Alexander that it is fixed, Alexander posts a funny comment that the admins should've give him pole, Users have a small smile about the humorous post, Steven Tindle arrives...
|
|
|
|
|
There was no bug with the qualifications, only with the numbers displayed on the QualStats page. We added by mistake the qualified managers in the new Amateur groups to the Rookie groups. That has been fixed now, sorry for the confusion.
|
|
|
|
I was wondering if it was just a visual bug, wouldn't have thought there would be anything else. Thanks Steffl!
(E: Loved your reaction in the tequila shots video btw.)
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Jed Lilly @ October 5th 2012,00:48:26 ) Alexander qualified and was not quickest, Alexander looks at the qualifying stats, Alexander comments on an anomaly on the page, Users tell Alexander that it is fixed, Alexander posts a funny comment that the admins should've give him pole, Users have a small smile about the humorous post, Steven Tindle arrives...
Ye it's you Jed who has misread his posts...
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Steven Tindle @ October 5th 2012,00:51:19 )
Ye it's you Jed who has misread his posts...
Continue.
|
|
|
|
Quote ( Joe Manifold @ October 5th 2012,00:49:34 ) (E: Loved your reaction in the tequila shots video btw.)
Oh? I did react in any way? Have to check the vid again :D
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Română
Italiano
Português
Português
Français
Polski
Русский
Български
Македонски
Nederlands
Vlaams
Suomi
Lietuvių
Čeština
Magyar
Eesti keel
Slovenčina
Türkçe
Shqip
Ελληνικά
Hrvatski
Bahasa Melayu
Dansk
Pirate
